Six checks running automatically every Monday. Title tags, meta descriptions, Core Web Vitals, keyword rankings, schema, and internal links, all analyzed and emailed to you with a specific fix plan.
Missing titles, duplicate titles, and titles that are too short or too long for Google's snippet display.
Missing, duplicate, or truncated descriptions that reduce click-through rates in search results.
LCP, CLS, TBT, and FCP scored against Google's pass/fail thresholds. Red/green per metric.
Your 20 tracked terms with current Google position and weekly change. Drop alerts in the report.
Broken internal links, orphaned pages with no internal links pointing to them, and redirect chains.
Missing or broken structured data that prevents rich results like star ratings, FAQs, or breadcrumbs.
Most SEO tools send you a report. It shows numbers. You have to interpret the numbers, decide which ones matter, figure out what caused them to change, and determine what action to take. That requires SEO knowledge, and it takes time.
SEO Monitor runs an audit. The output isn't just data, it's a diagnosis with a prescription. Each issue found includes a plain-English explanation of why it matters for rankings and what to do to fix it. The AI action plan then ranks all the issues by impact so you know where to start.
This matters especially for non-SEO professionals. You don't need to know that a missing H1 tag creates a heading hierarchy problem that hurts crawlability. The audit just says: "Your homepage has no H1 tag. Add one containing your primary keyword. This is a quick fix with a measurable ranking benefit."
These examples come from actual site audits. The findings show the kind of specific, actionable output the tool produces:
A one-time SEO audit costs hundreds to thousands of dollars from an agency, gives you a PDF report, and is out of date within two weeks. Your site changes. Google's algorithm updates. Competitors make moves. What was clean in January has new issues by March.
Weekly automated audits catch issues as they appear. A plugin update breaks your schema markup on a Tuesday. The audit runs Sunday night and flags it Monday morning. You fix it the same week rather than discovering it six months later when rankings have already fallen.
Weekly also builds a clean audit history. You can look back and see exactly when a problem first appeared and when it was resolved. That history is useful when troubleshooting ranking drops, because the timing often lines up with a specific change you made.
The audit checks your homepage plus key pages associated with your tracked keywords. We focus depth over breadth, running thorough checks on the pages most likely to affect your ranking goals rather than a shallow crawl of hundreds of pages.
No. The audit runs at a slow, polite crawl rate that has no measurable impact on server performance. It's indistinguishable from a single user browsing the site.
The audit runs overnight on Sunday. Results arrive in your inbox Monday morning. You don't wait for it, and you don't need to trigger it. It runs automatically every week.
HTML email with clear sections: keyword ranking table at the top, Core Web Vitals pass/fail summary, on-page issues list, and the AI action plan at the bottom. Readable on mobile. No attachments, no PDFs to download.
The weekly audit overlaps with several GMC policy requirements. It flags missing or broken Product schema, price-availability mismatches, slow product pages, and policy pages that fail to render. These are leading indicators of a Google Merchant Center suspension. For a full 43-point GMC audit specifically, run the free scan at gmcsuspension.com.
Three additions in May 2026: INP (Interaction to Next Paint) is now graded against Google's 200ms threshold, the schema module warns on missing reviewCount and on price-availability mismatches that can trigger a GMC price mismatch disapproval, and the internal-link module detects soft-404 pages returning 200 OK with no content (a common Shopify and WooCommerce crawl-budget drain).
Google's May 2026 ranking update pushed three signals up the weight list: INP (Interaction to Next Paint), Product schema completeness, and policy-page reachability. The weekly audit added all three as first-class checks the same week.
INP is now graded against the 200ms threshold. A slow add-to-cart button (often caused by an analytics or chat-widget handler) can fail INP on a page that passes LCP and CLS, and the audit now flags the specific event handler and the script that owns it. Product schema completeness now checks priceValidUntil, availability, and itemCondition, and reports mismatches between the schema and the visible page price (the same mismatch Google checks before approving a Merchant Center feed).
Policy-page reachability is the third add. Several GMC suspensions in May 2026 traced back to a privacy policy or returns policy that returned 200 OK but rendered as an empty client-side React component to Googlebot. The audit now fetches each policy URL with a Googlebot user agent and confirms that real text is present in the server response.
The weekly audit and the GMC scan answer different questions. The audit asks: is my organic search performance steady this week. The GMC scan asks: is my account in line with the 43 Merchant Center policy requirements right now.
The overlap is the on-page section. Product schema, image alt text, internal linking, canonical chains, and policy-page reachability appear in both because Google uses the same checks for both organic Shopping listings and paid Shopping ads. When the weekly audit flags one of these, that finding usually maps to a specific 43-point check, and the email links straight to the relevant fix guide such as the website needs improvement guide or the pre-appeal checklist.
Register your site in under three minutes. Your first audit runs within 24 hours. Every Monday after that, a fresh audit arrives in your inbox with specific fixes ranked by impact.
Register Your Site, From $9/Month